# 189. Rotate Array

## The Problem

Link to original problem on Leetcode.

Given an array, rotate the array to the right by `k`

steps, where `k`

is non-negative.

**Follow up**:

- Try to come up as many solutions as you can, there are at least 3 different ways to solve this problem.
- Could you do it in-place with $O(1)$ extra space?

Example 1:

```
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], k = 3
Output: [5,6,7,1,2,3,4]
Explanation:
rotate 1 steps to the right: [7,1,2,3,4,5,6]
rotate 2 steps to the right: [6,7,1,2,3,4,5]
rotate 3 steps to the right: [5,6,7,1,2,3,4]
```

Example 2:

```
Input: nums = [-1,-100,3,99], k = 2
Output: [3,99,-1,-100]
Explanation:
rotate 1 steps to the right: [99,-1,-100,3]
rotate 2 steps to the right: [3,99,-1,-100]
```

Constraints:

- 1 <=
`nums.length`

<= 2 * 10^{4} - -2
^{31}<=`nums[i]`

<= 2^{31}- 1 - 0 <= k <= 10
^{5}

## My Solution

### Naive Approach

Never hurts to start with a good brute-forcing. For each rotation `k`

, loop through the array `num`

and shift everything right by one. This will rotate the array with $O(n \times k)$ time complexity.

`// Bad solution, don't use this`

const rotate = function(nums, k) {

// First, get k down to a manageable size to avoid

// needlessly rotating the whole array multiple times

// for large values of k

k = k % nums.length;

for (let j = 0; j < k; j++) {

let previous = nums[nums.length - 1];

for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {

const newPrevious = nums[i];

nums[i] = previous;

previous = newPrevious;

}

}

// Instructions are to modify in place, so nothing returned.

};

### JavaScript Array Functions

JavaScript's `splice`

function can be a little weird, but useful once you know how it works. Here we greatly speed up the array shifting by lopping off from the end of the `nums`

array and inserting it to the front.

I think it would've been cleaner to `splice`

off the end, then `push`

the remaining `nums`

to the end of that splice—but, despite `console.log(nums)`

reading correctly after doing this, Leetcode's solution checker didn't like that.

I'm sure the fact that I didn't write some elaborate algorithm to do this is a violation of the spirit of Leetcode. Time complexity should be $O(n)$.

`const rotate = function(nums, k) {`

k = k % nums.length;

// Splice can delete and insert!

// The inner splice deletes from nums

// starting at the index of nums.length - k,

// and running to the end.

// The outer splice starts at index 0, deletes 0

// items, then inserts the spread out returned

// value of the inner splice.

nums.splice(0,0,...nums.splice(nums.length - k));

};